Wanted: an Erich Fromm party
The social philosopher and psychoanalyst was
one of the 20th century's most prescient - yet sadly neglected - thinkers.
Neil Clark
Tue 20 Feb 2007 12.17 GMT
"A healthy economy is only possible at the
expense of unhealthy human beings".
I wonder what the social philosopher and
psychoanalyst Dr Erich Fromm, the man who wrote those words over 30 years ago,
would make of Britain today.
Over the past decade we have witnessed an
unprecedented period of uninterrupted economic growth. Yet our collective
mental health has declined sharply. More than two million Britons are on
antidepressants, a million on Class A drugs. Binge drinking, and what Fromm called "acts of
destruction" - violence, self-abuse and vandalism - have reached record
levels. The Samaritans report that five million people are "extremely
stressed". Oliver James' new book, Affluenza, and last week's Unicef
report, which listed Britain's children as the unhappiest in Europe, are
powerful indictments of the society we have become.
Class A
drugs: The
Misuse of Drugs Act sets out three separate categories, Class A, Class B, and
Class C. Class A drugs represent those deemed most dangerous, and so carry the
harshest punishments.
Binge
drinking: Binge
drinking is the consumption of large amounts of alcohol within a short period
of time.
Indictment: If you say that one thing is an
indictment of another thing, you mean that it shows how bad the other thing is.
For solutions to our predicament, don't look to
neo-liberal politicians such as Ed Vaizey, and other members of the political
parties bankrolled by big business. And don't look either to short-term fixes
like the cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) advocated by Richard Layard.
Instead, turn to the work of Erich Fromm, one
of the 20th century's most prescient - yet sadly neglected - thinkers.
In The Sane Society (1955), Fromm argued that a
society, in which "consumption has become the de facto goal", was
itself sick. He advanced his theory of social character: that "every
society produces the character it needs". Early Calvinistic capitalism
produced the "hoarding
character", who hoards both possessions and feelings: the classic
Victorian man of property.
Hoard: If you hoard things such as
food or money, you save or store them, often in secret, because they are
valuable or important to you.
Post-war capitalism, Fromm argued, produced
another, equally neurotic type: "the marketing character", who
"adapts to the market economy by becoming detached from authentic
emotions, truth and conviction". For the marketing character
"everything is transformed into a commodity, not only things, but the
person himself, his physical energy, his skills, his knowledge, his opinions,
his feelings, even his smiles". (For a perfect example of a
"marketing character", just think of the current inhabitant of No 10
Downing Street). [Tony Blair In office 2
May 1997 – 27 June 2007]
Modern global capitalism requires marketing
characters in abundance and makes sure it gets them. Meanwhile, Fromm's ideal
character type, the mature "productive character", the person without
a mask, who loves and creates, and for whom being is more important than
having, is discouraged.
Fromm was also deeply concerned with the way
that love, "the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problem of human
existence" was undermined by an economic system which rewards greed and selfishness.
Greed: Greed is the desire to have
more of something, such as food or money, than is necessary or fair.
Selfishness: If you say that someone is
selfish, you mean that he or she cares only about himself or herself, and not
about other people.
In The Art of Loving (1956), Fromm identified
five types of love, all of which were endangered. Brotherly love, the most
important, "the one which underlies all others", was undermined by
the reduction of human beings to commodities. Motherly love was threatened by
narcissism and possessiveness. Self-love, without which we cannot love others,
was destroyed by selfishness. The love of God was regressing "to an
idolatric concept of God". Finally, erotic love was debased by its
separation from brotherly love and the absence of tenderness.
In the turbo-capitalist Britain of 2007, the
war against love which Erich Fromm warned of, has gone into overdrive. Glossy magazines
encourage anti-love sexual permissiveness and the cultivation of selfish and
materialistic lifestyles. Multimillion dollar industries promoting the cult of
narcissism have grown up, in which reality television is the latest and crudest
manifestation. We are encouraged to view all human contacts as expendable, to
be "traded-in" whenever we can get a better deal. Hire and fire rules
not just in the business world, but in our personal lives too. And we wonder
why we are so unhappy.
Warn: Notify, tell, remind, inform
Into
overdrive: Into a
state of intense activity
Glossy
magazines: Glossy magazines, leaflets, books, and photographs are produced on
expensive, shiny paper.
Erich Fromm shows us how we can fight back. The
good doctor didn't just diagnose the disease, he put forward the remedies.
There could be no improvement in our collective health unless society changed
from the "having" to the "being" mode of existence.
The brainwashing methods used in modern
advertising, described by Fromm as the "poison of mass suggestion"
must be prohibited. The gap between rich and poor must be closed. A new,
participatory form of democracy, "in which the well-being of the community
becomes each citizen's private concern", must be introduced. There should
be maximum decentralisation throughout industry and politics. And most
importantly of all, ''the right of stockholders and management of big
enterprises to determine their production solely on the basis of profit and
expansion" must be drastically curbed. Fromm was unequivocal: the needs of
people must come before the needs of capital.
The measures that Fromm put forward will no
doubt be dismissed by some as unworkable or too left-wing, (as indeed similar,
sensible measures put forward by Oliver James have been). And as Fromm himself,
warned big business would use all its "tremendous power" to fight
such changes. But if we are serious about constructing a society in which
solidarity and brotherly love come to the fore, nothing less
than a complete overhaul of our economic system will
do.
A healthy economy or healthy human beings? I
vote for the latter. How about you?
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada