The long read
The mindfulness conspiracy
It is sold as a
force that can help us cope with the ravages of capitalism, but with its inward
focus, mindful meditation may be the enemy of activism. By Ronald Purser
Fri 14 Jun 2019
06.00 BST
(...)
If mindfulness
just helps people cope with the toxic conditions that make them stressed in the
first place, then perhaps we could aim a bit higher. Should we celebrate the
fact that this perversion is helping people to “auto-exploit” themselves? This
is the core of the problem.
(...)
Over the past
few decades, neoliberalism has outgrown its conservative roots. It has hijacked
public discourse to the extent that even self-professed progressives, such as
Kabat-Zinn, think in neoliberal terms. Market values have invaded every corner
of human life, defining how most of us are forced to interpret and live in the
world.
Perhaps the most
straightforward definition of neoliberalism comes from the French sociologist
Pierre Bourdieu, who calls it “a programme for destroying collective structures
that may impede the pure market logic”. We are generally conditioned to think
that a market-based society provides us with ample (if not equal) opportunities
for increasing the value of our “human capital” and self-worth. And in order to
fully actualise personal freedom and potential, we need to maximise our own
welfare, freedom, and happiness by deftly managing internal resources.
Since
competition is so central, neoliberal ideology holds that all decisions about
how society is run should be left to the workings of the marketplace, the most
efficient mechanism for allowing competitors to maximise their own good. Other
social actors – including the state, voluntary associations, and the like – are
just obstacles to the smooth operation of market logic.
(...)
All of this may
help you to sleep better at night. But the consequences for society are
potentially dire. The Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek has analysed this
trend. As he sees it, mindfulness is “establishing itself as the hegemonic
ideology of global capitalism”, by helping people “to fully participate in the
capitalist dynamic while retaining the appearance of mental sanity”.
(...)
An illustrative
example is the practice of recycling. The real problem is the mass production
of plastics by corporations, and their overuse in retail. However, consumers
are led to believe that being personally wasteful is the underlying issue,
which can be fixed if they change their habits. As a recent essay in Scientific
American scoffs: “Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a
nail is to halting a falling skyscraper.”
(...)
At face value,
these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the
role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever
misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep
America Beautiful as the first corporate greenwashing front, as it has helped
shift the public focus to consumer recycling behaviour and thwarted legislation
that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management.
Courtesy of
Guardian News & Media Ltd.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada