Does new DNA evidence prove that there were
female viking warlords?
A viking
grave in the Swedish town of Birka has been found to contain a woman’s bones.
How many more warriors’ remains have been incorrectly presumed male?
Paula Cocozza @CocozzaPaula
Tue 12 Sep 2017
17.42 BST
A well-furnished warrior grave in
the Viking age town of Birka, Sweden, has been found to contain female bones.
So, a female Viking warrior. And not just any warrior, but a senior one: she
was buried alongside a sword, an axe, a spear, armour-piercing arrows, a battle
knife, two shields and two horses. Gaming pieces – perhaps from hnefatafl, a
sort of precursor to chess – suggest the female warrior from grave Bj581 was a
battle strategist. Was she unique, or were the Viking ranks full of women?
“It is exciting because the
traditional images of Vikings are masculine and war hungry – with the women at
home baking, or looking after the kids,” says Becky Gowland, a lecturer in
archaeology at Durham University. “This burial is clearly of a high-status
woman. The fact that she’s buried with weapons indiciate this. It doesn’t
indicate that she’s a warrior, but if we interpret [male graves] in that way,
why not women as well?”
The female Viking warrior is a
familiar figure in popular culture, from early incarnations such as the Völsung
cycle of Norse mythology through to the History Channel’s Vikings series.
Valkyrie amulets have been found depicting women wearing dresses and armour.
But historical fact has largely lagged behind the
fictions.
Lag: To fall, move, or stay behind
The bones from grave Bj581 always
looked female – they were slender – making it a
so-called “anomalous” grave where the gender of the skeleton appeared at odds
with the martial objects buried with it. It took many years and, finally,
genomic testing to establish the lack of a Y chromosome. But some experts still
express doubts about the warrior’s identity.
Slender: A slender person is attractively thin and graceful.
Might the gaming pieces indicate
only that she enjoyed board games? Were the bones – excavated and labelled in
the 19th century – put with the wrong weapons? Or do these questions prove that
we recreate the past in the light of our own prejudice?
“Before we knew it was a woman, it
was interpreted as a warrior grave. Nothing in the archaeology has changed –
only the gender. I do believe she was a warrior,” says Charlotte
Hedenstierna-Jonson, the archaeologist at Uppsala University who led the
research.
“Because it was buried with weapons,
[people assumed] it must be a man,” Gowland says. “I think that’s a mistake that
archaeologists make quite often. When we do that, we’re just reproducing the
past in our image.”
So how many more warrior bones have
been presumed male that might be female? In Poland, “archaeology is really getting to grips with a number of anomalous graves”,
according to Carolyne Larrington, professor of medieval European literature at
Oxford University. There are thought to be further anomalies in Norway and
Sweden.
Get to grips: To deal with (a problem or subject)
“We are getting quite a lot of
evidence that the gender roles may have been more fluid in the Viking period
than we thought, and that it’s quite possible women may have been regarded as
socially male even though biologically they weren’t – and might have been able
to assume positions of military leadership,” Larrington says. “We don’t tend to
imagine the women sitting on the longships. But they
must have been there.”
Longship: a narrow open vessel with oars and a square sail, used esp by the
Vikings during medieval times (drakkar)
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada